Many times I have heard Anne Gernstein say as a party chair that she was required to stay out of primary election campaigns and to not support any candidate.
Many republicans around Oldham County were very upset with former Republican Party chairwoman Anne Gernstein because they believed that she did show favoritism to different candidates during the primary elections. The person who most often told me that she was not neutral was none other than former Magistrate Rick Rash who is now a candidate in the republican primary for Oldham Circuit Court Clerk.
You can imagine how surprised I was when I drove by the home of J.D. Sparks on Tuesday and found yard signs in his yard supporting Rick Rash and Alecia Webb-Edgington who is a candidate for congress. J.D. Sparks is a Magistrate and the current Vice Chairman of the Oldham County Republican Party. Why do people not learn from the mistakes of others. That is the cheapest education that you can get.
I spoke to J.D. Sparks via email about the matter and he told me that he was not supporting the candidates in his role as Vice Chairman of the Republican Party but as an individual. He said that he saw nothing wrong with his actions.
Well, I respectfully disagree with Magistrate Sparks. Or, should I say Vice Chairman Sparks. That brings up another issue, Should elected officials be officers of a political party? I certainly do not believe that they should but perhaps the party could not find anyone else willing to serve as party officials. Back to the situation at hand, Magistrate Sparks just does not get it. When you take certain positions or certain employment in life you give up certain privileges. For example, in my role as Officer in Charge of the Immigration and Naturalization Service I had to refrain from speaking unfavorably about the policies of that agency even though I might disagree with them. In my opinion when J.D. Sparks took on the role of Vice Chairman of the Republican Party he gave up his right to endorse republican candidates in contested primary elections. Perhaps he does not understand that. Or, perhaps he does not want to accept it.
For Vice chairman Sparks to continue endorsing republican candidates who are engaged in contested primaries reflects disrespect for other candidates and can only bring about dissension in the party and a lack of respect for him and his position.
As for Rick Rash, I encountered him putting up another one of his signs and took the opportunity to ask him why he put one of his signs in Mr. Sparks’ yard. He stated that Sparks had asked him for one of the signs. I reminded Rash of his frequent criticism of former chairwoman Gernstein’s actions that he considered to be unfair. After a few minutes of discussion he agreed that I was correct. He called me three hours later to inform me that his sign had been removed from Mr. Sparks’ yard. As far as I know Alecia Webb-Edgington’s sign is still in the yard.
I commend Mr. Rash for correcting his mistake. As for Mr. Sparks, he is young and perhaps he will someday learn that we don’t always have freedom of speech even though the constitution may guarantee that. Yes, freedom of speech is guaranteed but sometimes something else must be sacrificed to have that freedom. In this case Mr. Sparks should either give up his position as Vice chairman of the Republican Party or he should refrain from openly supporting candidates in primary elections.
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
SEWER RATE TO RISE AND SURCHARGE TO BE INSTITUTED
On May 1st. the Oldham County Fiscal Court passed an ordinance raising sewer rates by five percent while also instituting a surcharge of $5.39 per month per customer. The surcharge will remain in place for twenty years. This increase comes after a rate increase of eight percent last year. The purpose of the surcharge is to pay for debt service on bonds that the Environmental Authority (Oldham Sewer District) has obtained to finance replacement of package treatment plants and other work on sewer lines that the district claims is being mandated by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Division of Water.
Over two years ago the Oldham Fiscal Court took over the responsibility for several million dollars worth of debt that the sewer district had outstanding in order to improve the credit rating of the sewer district. At the time I told the court that they were just giving the sewer district the opportunity to obtain more loans and go deeper in debt. Well, that has now happened-they have gone deeper in debt and the ratepayers will be each pay an additional $5.39 per month for the next twenty years to service that debt. Frankly, I expect that Oldham County residents have not seen the last of sewer rate increases and additional surcharges.
One magistrate asked a representative of the sewer district how long we could expect to see increases in sewer rates. I subsequently addressed the court and answered his question. Simple, as long as the court continues to vote in favor of the increases. The sewer district only asks for the increases. The court must grant the increases and is therefore responsible for the increases. It is also the responsibility of the court to devise a plan of action to address any action that the EPA and DOW might take if the county decided to challenge those agencies.
The court always blames the EPA and the Division of Water for forcing them to make changes. They often refer to these changes as unfunded mandates. Using this excuse the court says that it is left with no choice but to increase rates. I disagree. I believe that they should challenge the EPA and DOW. It may be difficult for the county to do this alone but it is time for someone in county government to take the lead and form a coalition of counties to challenge the EPA and DOW Perhaps it is easier to just pass another ordinance raising rates than to make that challenge.
To be fair, Magistrate Bob Leslie voted against the increase. All other magistrates and the county judge voted in favor of the increase and surcharge.
Over two years ago the Oldham Fiscal Court took over the responsibility for several million dollars worth of debt that the sewer district had outstanding in order to improve the credit rating of the sewer district. At the time I told the court that they were just giving the sewer district the opportunity to obtain more loans and go deeper in debt. Well, that has now happened-they have gone deeper in debt and the ratepayers will be each pay an additional $5.39 per month for the next twenty years to service that debt. Frankly, I expect that Oldham County residents have not seen the last of sewer rate increases and additional surcharges.
One magistrate asked a representative of the sewer district how long we could expect to see increases in sewer rates. I subsequently addressed the court and answered his question. Simple, as long as the court continues to vote in favor of the increases. The sewer district only asks for the increases. The court must grant the increases and is therefore responsible for the increases. It is also the responsibility of the court to devise a plan of action to address any action that the EPA and DOW might take if the county decided to challenge those agencies.
The court always blames the EPA and the Division of Water for forcing them to make changes. They often refer to these changes as unfunded mandates. Using this excuse the court says that it is left with no choice but to increase rates. I disagree. I believe that they should challenge the EPA and DOW. It may be difficult for the county to do this alone but it is time for someone in county government to take the lead and form a coalition of counties to challenge the EPA and DOW Perhaps it is easier to just pass another ordinance raising rates than to make that challenge.
To be fair, Magistrate Bob Leslie voted against the increase. All other magistrates and the county judge voted in favor of the increase and surcharge.
Friday, February 17, 2012
NO NEW JAIL NEEDED
Well, it has been a long time since I have posted anything on this site. I was hoping that this site would no longer be needed to the extent that it was when I launched it. However, I was wrong. Judge Voegele and the Fiscal Court are not using common sense in operating our county government.
First, Judge Voegele promised to reduce the Insurance Premium tax and he promised to not to build a new jail. To date there has been no initiative on the part of Judge Voegele to reduce the tax and now Fiscal court appears to be seriously considering the construction of a new jail. Judge Voegele has not openly opposed the idea. The issue of the Insurance Premium Tax is very simple – Judge Voegele failed to keep a campaign promise.
Actually the issue of a new jail is just about as simple. It is a stupid idea with no merit. According to Jailer Mike Simpson the average population of the jail by inmates from Oldham County is 40 per day. The simple solution is to close our jail and house the inmates in another county. This action would save a lot of money in the form of salaries, building maintenance, and money that would be necessary to construct a new facility. That might lead to Mike Simpson losing his job. However, he has been receiving a pension in addition to his regular salary for years which should have allowed him to be in better financial condition than the average Oldham County employee. There would be other employees involved. There would be a need for additional Sheriff’s deputies to transport prisoners. Perhaps those current jail employees who are qualified could be hired as deputies to perform that work.
The present jail is large enough to house Oldham County prisoners and that is all that the county should consider. To attempt to get into the business of housing prisoners for profit is absolutely absurd. The county tried to get into the real estate business when it bought the property for Oldham reserve and that was a big mistake. To get into the business of housing prisoners would also be a mistake. The purpose of the government is to provide necessary services for the people – not to be a profit making business.
The three magistrates on the jail committee should reconsider what they are doing. Magistrates Bob Dye and JD Sparks claimed to be for smaller government and both beat opponents who had raised taxes in the county. Now they want to spend 19 million dollars to build a new jail that is not necessary. Where do they have their heads? Magistrate Steve Greenwell is running for Circuit Court Clerk. Does he expect people to elect him to that office when he wants to grow government?
The problem is that the county government has more money coming in than it needs and it has to find a place to spend it rather than give it back to the people. It is time for the people to demand the return of their money or to begin looking for new candidates. It is that simple.
The “watchdog” is back!
First, Judge Voegele promised to reduce the Insurance Premium tax and he promised to not to build a new jail. To date there has been no initiative on the part of Judge Voegele to reduce the tax and now Fiscal court appears to be seriously considering the construction of a new jail. Judge Voegele has not openly opposed the idea. The issue of the Insurance Premium Tax is very simple – Judge Voegele failed to keep a campaign promise.
Actually the issue of a new jail is just about as simple. It is a stupid idea with no merit. According to Jailer Mike Simpson the average population of the jail by inmates from Oldham County is 40 per day. The simple solution is to close our jail and house the inmates in another county. This action would save a lot of money in the form of salaries, building maintenance, and money that would be necessary to construct a new facility. That might lead to Mike Simpson losing his job. However, he has been receiving a pension in addition to his regular salary for years which should have allowed him to be in better financial condition than the average Oldham County employee. There would be other employees involved. There would be a need for additional Sheriff’s deputies to transport prisoners. Perhaps those current jail employees who are qualified could be hired as deputies to perform that work.
The present jail is large enough to house Oldham County prisoners and that is all that the county should consider. To attempt to get into the business of housing prisoners for profit is absolutely absurd. The county tried to get into the real estate business when it bought the property for Oldham reserve and that was a big mistake. To get into the business of housing prisoners would also be a mistake. The purpose of the government is to provide necessary services for the people – not to be a profit making business.
The three magistrates on the jail committee should reconsider what they are doing. Magistrates Bob Dye and JD Sparks claimed to be for smaller government and both beat opponents who had raised taxes in the county. Now they want to spend 19 million dollars to build a new jail that is not necessary. Where do they have their heads? Magistrate Steve Greenwell is running for Circuit Court Clerk. Does he expect people to elect him to that office when he wants to grow government?
The problem is that the county government has more money coming in than it needs and it has to find a place to spend it rather than give it back to the people. It is time for the people to demand the return of their money or to begin looking for new candidates. It is that simple.
The “watchdog” is back!
Sunday, December 26, 2010
WILL OLDHAM COUNTY HAVE ANOTHER FISCAL COURT THAT DISRESPECTS THE LAW
The Murner-led Fiscal Court is over for all intent and practical purposes. The court held its last meeting on December 21, 2010. Each Magistrate took the opportunity to express his/her gratitude for having been elected by their constituents. There was an unusual appearance of harmony among the Magistrates - probably more than since their first meeting four years ago.
Personally, I am very glad to see the end of the Murner-lead Fiscal Court. Judge Murner demonstrated a total disregard for the law - especially where open government was concerned. Many people were glad to see him reined in by a court of law over his illegal acts of secrecy. Murner has constantly bragged about achieving a balanced budget and ending his term with a major surplus. I never heard him say that he balanced that budget by raising taxes, which he significantly increased on Oldham County families. He always claimed that the balanced budget was due to cuts in personnel and other cuts in the budget; an example of misleading the public that was the trademark of the Murner administration. However, in the end the escalation of taxes and fees proved to be fatal to Murner’s hope of having his hand-picked successor be elected as County Judge/Executive. Still further, the escalation of taxes and fees also served to cause several Magistrates to fail in their endeavor to be re-elected. Some of them may not realize this or want to accept it, but any non-biased person can easily see it. That is what blind loyalty can do for you.
Now the obvious question is: will the incoming Magistrates be as blind as some of those whom they are replacing? They will get their first test at the first meeting on January 3, 2011. At that first meeting, the new County Judge/Executive, David Voegele, will present to the court/new Magistrates the names of several people that he will be hiring for their approval.
Of the names of the people Judge Voegele will present will be John Black, his brother-in-law. Judge Voegele has selected Black to be his deputy. The fact is that Voegele does not need the approval of the Fiscal Court for the position of Deputy County Judge/Executive. However, Voegele has stated that he would present Black to the court along with the names of his other new-hires. By doing this Voegele will be asking the Magistrates to violate the county administrative code - or at least condone his questionable selection. That is simply being insensitive to the members of the court. Seems like another County Judge we’ve seen over the past four years doesn’t it?
The present Oldham County code of ethics is part of the county administrative code. Section 4.3 (Nepotism) of the code states: “Members of any County government officer’s or employee’s immediate family are ineligible for employment by the Fiscal Court.”
The selection of John Black by David Voegele is clearly nepotism and should not be tolerated. Moreover, by Voegele asking the court to approve or condone the selection of Black he is showing disrespect for them and asking them to do something that that they may be criticized for doing by their constituents. He is also taking advantage of the fact that some of the members are new to the court and may not feel comfortable opposing him in the very first meeting. Although this may be a good tactical move by Voegele, it is unethical. The people of Oldham County will get a very good sense of the direction that this court will follow for the next four years. David Voegele can be assured that the people will not forget what he is doing.
Judge Voegele may say that he is selecting Black because he is very qualified by virtue of the fact that he was the County Judge before. That argument has several holes in it. First, the people of Oldham County no longer wanted Democrat John Black as County Judge as he was defeated in his bid for a third term by Mary Ellen Kinser. Second, surely Voegele had someone else in mind to be his deputy should John Black have been elected to the Kentucky State Senate seat that he sought, though he was soundly defeated by Republican Ernie Harris. Then there is the fact that the “end does not justify the means”, especially when the “means” result in a violation of the law; a law that John Black instituted when he was the County Judge. How ironic is that now? When John Black sought the change in the administrative code did he believe that the change should only be applicable to others and not him? In other words, do as I say, not as I do.
David Voegele still has time to correct his mistake but does he have the desire to do what is right or will it be full speed ahead, the law be dammed?
Personally, I am very glad to see the end of the Murner-lead Fiscal Court. Judge Murner demonstrated a total disregard for the law - especially where open government was concerned. Many people were glad to see him reined in by a court of law over his illegal acts of secrecy. Murner has constantly bragged about achieving a balanced budget and ending his term with a major surplus. I never heard him say that he balanced that budget by raising taxes, which he significantly increased on Oldham County families. He always claimed that the balanced budget was due to cuts in personnel and other cuts in the budget; an example of misleading the public that was the trademark of the Murner administration. However, in the end the escalation of taxes and fees proved to be fatal to Murner’s hope of having his hand-picked successor be elected as County Judge/Executive. Still further, the escalation of taxes and fees also served to cause several Magistrates to fail in their endeavor to be re-elected. Some of them may not realize this or want to accept it, but any non-biased person can easily see it. That is what blind loyalty can do for you.
Now the obvious question is: will the incoming Magistrates be as blind as some of those whom they are replacing? They will get their first test at the first meeting on January 3, 2011. At that first meeting, the new County Judge/Executive, David Voegele, will present to the court/new Magistrates the names of several people that he will be hiring for their approval.
Of the names of the people Judge Voegele will present will be John Black, his brother-in-law. Judge Voegele has selected Black to be his deputy. The fact is that Voegele does not need the approval of the Fiscal Court for the position of Deputy County Judge/Executive. However, Voegele has stated that he would present Black to the court along with the names of his other new-hires. By doing this Voegele will be asking the Magistrates to violate the county administrative code - or at least condone his questionable selection. That is simply being insensitive to the members of the court. Seems like another County Judge we’ve seen over the past four years doesn’t it?
The present Oldham County code of ethics is part of the county administrative code. Section 4.3 (Nepotism) of the code states: “Members of any County government officer’s or employee’s immediate family are ineligible for employment by the Fiscal Court.”
The selection of John Black by David Voegele is clearly nepotism and should not be tolerated. Moreover, by Voegele asking the court to approve or condone the selection of Black he is showing disrespect for them and asking them to do something that that they may be criticized for doing by their constituents. He is also taking advantage of the fact that some of the members are new to the court and may not feel comfortable opposing him in the very first meeting. Although this may be a good tactical move by Voegele, it is unethical. The people of Oldham County will get a very good sense of the direction that this court will follow for the next four years. David Voegele can be assured that the people will not forget what he is doing.
Judge Voegele may say that he is selecting Black because he is very qualified by virtue of the fact that he was the County Judge before. That argument has several holes in it. First, the people of Oldham County no longer wanted Democrat John Black as County Judge as he was defeated in his bid for a third term by Mary Ellen Kinser. Second, surely Voegele had someone else in mind to be his deputy should John Black have been elected to the Kentucky State Senate seat that he sought, though he was soundly defeated by Republican Ernie Harris. Then there is the fact that the “end does not justify the means”, especially when the “means” result in a violation of the law; a law that John Black instituted when he was the County Judge. How ironic is that now? When John Black sought the change in the administrative code did he believe that the change should only be applicable to others and not him? In other words, do as I say, not as I do.
David Voegele still has time to correct his mistake but does he have the desire to do what is right or will it be full speed ahead, the law be dammed?
Sunday, November 28, 2010
WILL POLITICS AND BAD HABITS EVER CHANGE IN OLDHAM COUNTY
Does every elected County Judge-Executive believe that he has to help an old friend, relative, supporter, or someone who needs to enhance their state retirement benefits? First, Duane Murner hired Bill Tucker shortly after being elected County Judge-Executive and Tucker remains on the county payroll to this day. Tucker has been on social security for years and should have opted to allow a younger person who was in need of a job to be employed. However, he received a substantial increase in pay from his previous magisterial salary, after he was removed from office by the voters. Thus, his retirement will be increased significantly. Likewise, Judge Murner hired former magistrate Paula Gish to be his Deputy Judge-Executive and gave her a huge increase in salary. Again, her retirement will increase significantly due to this increase in pay. What is worse is that one of her duties has been to supervise the county payroll clerk and the state auditor said in an annual report that she was not qualified to do that. The payroll clerk was recently fired by County Judge Murner but Gish remains on the job making over $70K per year.
Well, David Voegele also has decided to help an old friend and relative increase his retirement. He decided to hire his brother-in-law, John Black, to be his deputy at a salary of over $55K per year. John Black has been driving a school bus in order to enhance his retirement. It is a great promotion when you go from school bus driver to Deputy County Judge. I once heard Voegele remark that it would be a great promotion for a person to go from janitor to county treasurer. He also remarked that it would make a great title for a story. I guess that he forgot that, or believes that it does not apply to him. I’m sorry David, but you can’t have it both ways.
David Voegele promised change throughout his campaign this past spring. As a matter of fact, he told me that he would make a lot of changes if the people would just give him a chance. He knows, or at least he should know, that many people voted for him because they felt that he was the lesser of two evils. Voegele has gotten his chance but so far I have not seen the change. Hiring his brother-in-law is not a change in practice from the past administration. To make matters worse, John Black is a staunch democrat who has been defeated in his last two attempts to achieve elective office. He was just recently soundly defeated by Ernie Harris in a bid for the Kentucky State Senate. Black ran on a democratic agenda which supported expanded gambling in Kentucky. Did that not tell David Voegele that the people of Oldham County have rejected John Black?
While we are on the issue of change, there are two more items that need to be addressed. Voegele railed against the huge debt that the county has amassed and the huge increase in the insurance premium tax rate. The first two items of business Voegele should have on his agenda are the reduction of the insurance premium tax by fifty percent and the retirement of some of the county debt. The county has a huge surplus at the present time (over $8 million) and can afford to accomplish both of these feats. If Voegele does not do this quickly, the county should not expect him to do anything that he promised. As a matter of fact, the people had better be on the defensive.
Since the primary election, Voegele has went against several of his campaign messages and disappointed many in the public. He voted to once again increase sewer rates by 25% and to add additional debt to the Fiscal Court budget through accepting debt taken on by the sewer district to finance their ongoing abysmal operations. The court voted to approve the measure by one vote, meaning Voegele’s vote in the opposite direction would have prevented the increase from becoming a reality.
Voegele also needs to make some personnel changes in his administration as soon as he takes office. He was also opposed by nearly all of the county government employees working in Judge-Executive Duane Murner’s office in addition to most of the department heads in county government. In fact, many of them worked extensively to support the candidacy of Paula Gish in the primary election. This includes employees making financial contributions to Gish, displaying yard signs, wearing campaign clothing at events, and openly supporting Gish whenever possible. He still has time to make those changes before he takes office, however it is questionable whether he has the stomach to make the tough decisions needed in this area.
I still believe that Voegele was the better choice for County Judge but my belief is fading fast.
Well, David Voegele also has decided to help an old friend and relative increase his retirement. He decided to hire his brother-in-law, John Black, to be his deputy at a salary of over $55K per year. John Black has been driving a school bus in order to enhance his retirement. It is a great promotion when you go from school bus driver to Deputy County Judge. I once heard Voegele remark that it would be a great promotion for a person to go from janitor to county treasurer. He also remarked that it would make a great title for a story. I guess that he forgot that, or believes that it does not apply to him. I’m sorry David, but you can’t have it both ways.
David Voegele promised change throughout his campaign this past spring. As a matter of fact, he told me that he would make a lot of changes if the people would just give him a chance. He knows, or at least he should know, that many people voted for him because they felt that he was the lesser of two evils. Voegele has gotten his chance but so far I have not seen the change. Hiring his brother-in-law is not a change in practice from the past administration. To make matters worse, John Black is a staunch democrat who has been defeated in his last two attempts to achieve elective office. He was just recently soundly defeated by Ernie Harris in a bid for the Kentucky State Senate. Black ran on a democratic agenda which supported expanded gambling in Kentucky. Did that not tell David Voegele that the people of Oldham County have rejected John Black?
While we are on the issue of change, there are two more items that need to be addressed. Voegele railed against the huge debt that the county has amassed and the huge increase in the insurance premium tax rate. The first two items of business Voegele should have on his agenda are the reduction of the insurance premium tax by fifty percent and the retirement of some of the county debt. The county has a huge surplus at the present time (over $8 million) and can afford to accomplish both of these feats. If Voegele does not do this quickly, the county should not expect him to do anything that he promised. As a matter of fact, the people had better be on the defensive.
Since the primary election, Voegele has went against several of his campaign messages and disappointed many in the public. He voted to once again increase sewer rates by 25% and to add additional debt to the Fiscal Court budget through accepting debt taken on by the sewer district to finance their ongoing abysmal operations. The court voted to approve the measure by one vote, meaning Voegele’s vote in the opposite direction would have prevented the increase from becoming a reality.
Voegele also needs to make some personnel changes in his administration as soon as he takes office. He was also opposed by nearly all of the county government employees working in Judge-Executive Duane Murner’s office in addition to most of the department heads in county government. In fact, many of them worked extensively to support the candidacy of Paula Gish in the primary election. This includes employees making financial contributions to Gish, displaying yard signs, wearing campaign clothing at events, and openly supporting Gish whenever possible. He still has time to make those changes before he takes office, however it is questionable whether he has the stomach to make the tough decisions needed in this area.
I still believe that Voegele was the better choice for County Judge but my belief is fading fast.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
